L. Alfieri, P. J. Brooks, N. J. Aldrich, and H. R. Tenenbaum, Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning?, Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.103, issue.1, pp.1-1810, 1037.
DOI : 10.1037/a0021017
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.688.7533

M. Bakia, K. Anderson, E. Heying, K. Keating, and J. Mislevy, Implementing Online Learning Labs in Schools and Districts: Lessons from Miami-Dade's First Year. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 2011.

. Balanskat, &. Blamire, and . Kefala, The ICT Impact Report A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe Available at, 2006.

. Becta, A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers Available at: http://partners.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/barriers Does the use of ICT affect quality in learning science at Key Stage 3, Studies in Teaching and Learning, pp.9-17, 2003.

A. E. Black and E. L. Deci, The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective, Science Education, vol.70, issue.6, pp.740-756, 2000.
DOI : 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3

K. A. Bingimlas, Barriers to the Successful Integration of ICT in Teaching and Learning Environments: A Review of the Literature Available at, In: Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education, vol.5, issue.3, pp.235-245, 2009.

J. E. Corter, S. K. Esche, C. Chassaspis, J. Ma, and J. V. Nickerson, Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated, and hands-on student laboratories, Computers & Education, vol.57, issue.3, pp.2054-2067, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.009

T. De-jong, COMPUTER SIMULATIONS: Technological Advances in Inquiry Learning, Science, vol.312, issue.5773, pp.532-533, 2006.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1127750
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190793

T. De-jong, A. Weinberger, and I. Girault, Using scenarios to design complex technology-enhanced learning environments. Education Tech Research Dev, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00873885

D. Olga, &. García-zubía, and . Javier, IT Innovative Practices in Secondary Schools: Remote Experiments, 2013.

D. Edelson, D. N. Gordin, and R. D. Pea, Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.8, issue.3-4, pp.391-450, 1999.
DOI : 10.1080/10508406.1999.9672075
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190609

P. A. Ertmer, Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.9, issue.1, pp.47-61, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02299597

A. Ferrari, JRC technical reports Digital Competence in Practice: An Analysis of Frameworks, 2012.

R. M. Gagne, The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction, 1985.

J. Gahala, Critical Issue: Promoting Technology Use in Schools Date posted: October Available at, 2001.

D. Gender, T. Institute, E. Development-centre, and . Inc, Effective Access, Teachers' use of digital resources in STEM teaching, 2005.

R. L. Goldstone and J. Y. Son, The Transfer of Scientific Principles Using Concrete and Idealized Simulations, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.234, issue.1, pp.69-110, 2005.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1009421303064

L. Gomes and S. Bogosyan, Current Trends in Remote Laboratories Available at, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, pp.4744-4756, 2009.

V. Hannon, Nuffield-Foundation-Osborne-Dillon- Science-Education-in-Europe.pdf http://www .infed.org/thinkers/polanyi FILE: A Tool for the Study of Inquiry Learning, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.149, issue.216, pp.945-956, 2005.

L. Pdf-johnson, A. Becker, S. Cummins, M. Estrada, V. Freeman et al., Report of the ICSU Ad-hoc Review Panel on Science Education Available at: http://www.icsu.org/publications/reports-and-reviews/report-of-the-icsu-ad-hoc-review- panel-on-science- education/Report%20on%20Science%20Education%20final%20pdf NMC Horizon Report: 2013 K-12 Edition, The NewMedia Consortium Go-Lab D6.2 Future Challenges Report Go-Lab 317601, 2011.

J. E. Joseph, The Barriers of using Education Technology for Optimizing the Educational Experience of Learners, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol.64, issue.2, pp.51-57, 2013.
DOI : 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.051

Y. Kali and . Linn, Designing Coherent Science Education: Implications from Curriculum, Instruction, and Policy, 2009.

N. Kastis, Observing the e-Learning phenomenon: The case of school education Analysing the transformative innovation of e-Learning. eLearning Papers, 2007.

M. Körös-mikis, A. Manlove, S. De-jong, and T. , Defining Innovative Pedagogical Practice Available at: http://www.ofi.hu/studies-articles-090617/defining-innovative Lazonder Use and usefulness of regulative scaffolds during collaborative inquiry learning, Paper presented at the twelfth European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, 2007.

E. L. Lewis, J. L. Stern, and M. C. Linn, The effect of computer simulations on introductory thermodynamics understanding, Educational Technology, pp.45-58, 1993.

X. D. Lin and J. Lehman, Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking, Journal of Research In Science Teaching, vol.36, issue.7, pp.1-22, 1999.

Y. Lou, P. C. Abrami, and S. Apollonia, Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis, Review of Educational Research, vol.71, issue.3, pp.449-521, 2001.
DOI : 10.3102/00346543071003449

C. Maisch, M. Ney, W. Van-joolingen, and T. De-jong, Inconsistent reasoning about measurement by undergraduate physics students, Proceedings de la conférence ESERA International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00948771

D. D. Minner, A. J. Levy, and J. Century, Inquiry-based science instruction-what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol.12, issue.5, pp.474-496, 1984.
DOI : 10.1002/tea.20347

F. Mulder, The LOGIC of National Policies and Strategies for Open Educational Resources. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, pp.96-105, 2013.

V. Naidoo, OER Strategy ? Taking it to a New Level Available at: http://www.col.org/resources/speeches/2013presentations/Pages/2013-11-19.aspx National Science Education Standards: An Overview, p. 18. Available at: http://www, Commonwealth of Learning. Nairobi, 2013.

C. P. Niemiec and R. M. Ryan, Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, pp.133-144, 2009.

T. Okada and H. A. Simon, Collaborative Discovery in a Scientific Domain, Cognitive Science, vol.12, issue.2, pp.109-146, 1997.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog2102_1

J. Osborne and J. Dillon, Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections Report to the Nuffield Foundation Available at, 2008.

J. Osborne and J. &dilon, Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. A report to the Nuffield Foundation, 2008.

W. J. Pelgrum, Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: results from a worldwide educational assessment, Computers & Education, vol.37, issue.2, pp.163-178, 2001.
DOI : 10.1016/S0360-1315(01)00045-8

S. Psycharis, Exploring the Effects of the Computational Experiment Approach to the Epistemic Beliefs, the Motivation, the Use of Modeling Indicators and Conceptual Understanding in Three Different Computational Learning Environments, Journal of Education and Training Studies, vol.1, issue.1, pp.69-87, 2013.
DOI : 10.11114/jets.v1i1.32

M. E. Ritter, Barriers to Teaching Introductory Physical Geography Online, In: Review of International Geographical Education Online, RIGEO, vol.242, issue.12, pp.1-4

R. E. Yager, Science Education -Overview, Preparation of Teachers, Available at: http://education.stateuniversity.com, 2403.

M. Rocard, P. Csermely, D. Jorde, D. Lenzen, H. Walberg-henriksson et al., Science education now: a renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe, European Commission, 2007.

J. Rudinsky and E. Law, Go-Lab Project Internal Deliverable G3.1: Report on Analysis of Online Labs User Surveys: Implications for the Go-Lab Portal Design, 2013.

F. Schanda, D. Dikke, and N. Mueller, Personal Learning Management Systems (PLMS): Concept, Classification, Evaluation, Proceedings of the 5th International eLBa Science Conference in Rostock, 2012.

C. Schreiner and S. Sjøberg, Sowing the seeds of ROSE: background, rationale, questionnaire development and data collection for ROSE (The Relevance of Science education) -a comparative study of students' views of science and science education, Acta Didactica, vol.4, 2004.

L. Shumow and J. A. Schmidt, Enhancing adolescents' motivation for science. Research-based strategies for teaching male and female, p.9781452269696, 2013.

S. D. Teasley, Talking About Reasoning: How Important Is the Peer in Peer Collaboration? Discourse, Tools and Reasoning, NATO ASI Series, vol.160, pp.361-384, 1997.

J. Thakrar, D. Zinn, and F. Wolfenden, Harnessing Open Educational Resources to the Challenges of Teacher Education in Sub-Saharan Africa. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10, 4. Available at, 1319.

W. R. Van-joolingen, D. Jong, T. Lazonder, A. W. Savelsbergh, E. R. Manlove et al., Co-Lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning, Computers in Human Behavior, vol.21, issue.4, p.671, 2005.
DOI : 10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.039

G. C. Vreman-de-olde, T. De-jong, and H. Gijlers, Learning by Designing Instruction in the Context of Simulation-based Inquiry Learning, Educational Technology & Society, vol.16, issue.4, pp.47-58, 2013.

V. Project, Teaching, teachers competencies and communities of practice Available at: http://visir-network

V. Project, Valuing learning, motivation, awareness and value of learning Available at: http://visir-network