L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives, 2001.

B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain, 1956.

R. H. Dave, Developing and writing behavioural objectives, 1975.

T. De-jong, M. C. Linn, and Z. C. Zacharia, Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education, Science, vol.340, issue.6130, 2013.
DOI : 10.1126/science.1230579

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00990360

D. Fisher, Table on revised bloom's taxonomy Oregon State University Extended Campus Retrieve from: http://oregonstate Assessing learning in museum environments: a practical guide for museum evaluators. From Science Museum of London. Retrieve from: http://sciencecentres.org.uk/events/reports/indicators_learning_1103_gammon, D1.1: Golab learning spaces specification, 7th Framework Programme, 2003.

G. Project, D3.1: Preliminary golab requirements specifications, needs analysis, and creative options, 7th Framework Programme, 2013.

G. Project, D5.2: Specifications of the GoLab Portal and App Composer, 7th Framework Programme, 2013.

W. Harlen, Principles and big ideas of science education, 2010.

A. Harrow, A taxonomy of psychomotor domain: a guide for developing behavioural objectives, 1972.

J. Hiebert and T. Carpenter, Learning and teaching with understanding, Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, pp.65-97, 1992.

S. Jackson, S. J. Stratford, J. Krajcik, and E. Soloway, Making Dynamic Modeling Accessible to Precollege Science Students, Interactive Learning Environments, vol.5, issue.3, 1996.
DOI : 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

S. K. Joseph and Y. S. Shawn, Defining the construct: the big ideas in nanoscale science and engineering. University of Michigan Retrieve from: http://www.mcrel.org/NanoTeach/pdfs/big_ideas D4.2: Open Discovery Space LOM application profile and curriculum based vocabularies, pdf ODS Project, p.297229, 2009.

O. Project, D2.1: OSR educational design. eContentPlus programme ECP, 2008.

M. Koehler and P. Mishra, What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, pp.60-70, 2009.

D. R. Krathwohl, B. S. Bloom, and B. B. Masia, Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals, 1973.

J. Marschner, H. Thillmann, J. Wirth, and D. Leutner, How can the use of strategies for experimentation be fostered? Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, p.7793, 2012.

R. M. Ross and D. Dugganhaas, Big ideas in earth system science, American Paleontologist, vol.18, p.2428, 2010.

E. J. Simpson, The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain, 1972.

V. Talanquer, Chemistry Education: Ten Facets To Shape Us, Journal of Chemical Education, vol.90, issue.7, pp.832-838, 2013.
DOI : 10.1021/ed300881v

E. E. Toth, B. Morrow, and L. Ludvico, Designing blended inquiry learning in a laboratory context: a study of incorporating handson and virtual laboratories. Innovative Higher Education, p.333344, 2009.

L. W. Trowbridge, R. W. Bybee, and J. C. Powell, Teaching secondary school science, 2000.

W. R. Van-joolingen and T. De-jong, Supporting hypothesis generation by learners exploring an interactive computer simulation, Instructional Science, vol.42, issue.5-6, p.389404, 1991.
DOI : 10.1007/BF00116355

G. T. Wiggins and J. Mctighe, Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Revising the ap biology curriculum, Science, vol.352, p.16271628, 2005.