So, what do you think is more likely? Chemical or parasite ,
Well, what do we think? Well, I on my part think that chemical is more likely ,
Yes, I agree. Because, although the parasite can also attack them (the frogs) but not that strongly. And it can also not block it ,
And also there is? I write it down, ok? (starts typing: " We think that the chemical hypothesis? ,
Well, but they did block something that one time [inaudible]. But when their heads are shrinked? ,
(continues typing: " ?is more logical " ) Is more logical, ok? Because? 7. Svenja: " Why do we think so ,
Firstly it has been growing over the last years a lot, and the chemical stuff has become more, too ,
Secondly, they also said somewhere that the parasite just can block a part, didn't they? " 10 ,
Yes, where did we read that ,
It was somewhere up there (points to screen) That's where they said it. How should I write it ,
Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning Environments, Kluwer book series on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 2003. ,
Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol.13, issue.3, pp.175-193, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1046/j.1365-2729.1997.00019.x
Using argument representations to make tkinking visible for individuals and groups, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL 1997), pp.10-19, 1997. ,
Promoting students' argument construction and collaborative debate in the science classroom Internet environments for science education, 2004. ,
Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE, International Journal of Science Education, vol.15, issue.3, pp.797-817, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53
Using computer supported argument visualization to teach leagal argumentation, Visualizing argumentation ? Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making, pp.75-96, 2003. ,
Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems, Cognitive Science, vol.2, issue.2, pp.145-182, 1989. ,
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1
Reasoning With Tools and Inscriptions, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.11, issue.2-3, pp.187-216, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1080/10508406.2002.9672137
Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design, Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL, pp.61-91, 2002. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190230
Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms, Science Education, vol.81, issue.3, pp.287-312, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
Cooperation Scripts for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning -CSCL 2003, COMMUNITY EVENTS - Communication and Interaction, pp.59-61, 2003. ,
The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building, Human Development, vol.43, issue.6, pp.332-360, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1159/000022695
Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations using scaffolded curriculum materials and assessments, 2004. ,
Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation, Cognitive perspectives on peer learning, pp.179-196, 1999. ,
The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.66, issue.1, pp.423-451, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1207/S15327809JLS0904_1
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190619
Person-plus: a distributed view of thinking and learning, Distributed cognitions: psychological and educational considerations, pp.88-110, 1993. ,
Supporting discourse in a synchronous learning environment, Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Foundations for a CSCL Community, CSCL '02, pp.581-589, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.3115/1658616.1658732
BGuiLE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress, pp.263-305, 2001. ,
Reasoning in conversation, Cognition and Instruction, issue.3&4, pp.11-347, 1993. ,
Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.19, issue.1, pp.5-51, 2003. ,
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199707)81:4<483::AID-SCE7>3.3.CO;2-R
Co-Lab, Design considerations for a collaborative discovery learning environment, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), 2004. ,
SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING, 1977. ,
DOI : 10.1016/B978-1-4832-1446-7.50019-4
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00692030
How do students make sense of Internet resources in the science classroom, Learning the sciences of the 21st Century, 2000. ,
The origins and nature of arguments: Studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negotiation, Discourse Processes, pp.113-133, 2001. ,
An integrated approach to implementing collaborative inquiry in the classroom, Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Computer support for collaborative learning, CSCL '97, pp.272-279, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.3115/1599773.1599807
The uses of argument, 1958. ,
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Knowledge convergence in computer-mediated learning environments: Effects of collaboration scripts, 2004. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00197409