S. Bannasch, Beam me up, Scottie! Handheld computers extend the range of wireless communication in schools, @CONCORDThe Concord Consortium), vol.4, issue.6, 2000.

S. Bannasch, Wireless computers and probeware support a new science curriculum: Using iPAQ PCs to study science fundamentals, @CONCORDThe Concord Consortium), vol.5, issue.7 11, 2001.

S. Bannasch and R. Tinker, Probeware takes a seat in the classroom: Educational impact of probes improves with time and innovation, @CONCORDThe Concord Consortium), vol.6, issue.7, 2002.

E. Baumgartner and S. Hsi, CILT2000: Synergy, Technology, and Teacher Professional Development, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol.11, issue.3, pp.311-315, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1016041123324

K. Crawford and C. Staudt, A computer in the palm of their hands, @CONCORDThe Concord Consortium), vol.4, issue.3, 1999.

S. J. Metcalf and R. Tinker, Probeware and Handhelds in Elementary and Middle School Science, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol.13, issue.1, pp.43-49, 2004.
DOI : 10.1023/B:JOST.0000019637.22473.02

C. Staudt, Probing untested ground: young students learn to use handheld computers, @CONCORDThe Concord Consortium), vol.4, issue.2, 1999.

C. Staudt, Handhelds track student progress: instant feedback though beaming identifies student misconceptions, @CONCORDThe Concord Consortium), vol.6, issue.4, 2002.

C. Staudt and P. Horwitz, Reconciling conflicting evidence: researchers use models and handhelds to investigate how students learn science, @CONCORDThe Concord Consortium), vol.5, issue.6, 2001.

C. Staudt and S. Hsi, Synergy projects and pocket computers, @CONCORDThe Concord Consortium), vol.3, issue.3, 1999.

R. Baker, E. L. Herman, and J. L. , A distributed evaluation model, Evaluating Educational Technology: Effective Research Designs for Improving Learning, pp.95-119, 2003.

H. J. Becker and B. E. Lovitts, A project-based approach to assessing technology, Evaluating Educational Technology: Effective Research Designs for Improving Learning, pp.129-148, 2003.

K. M. Culp, M. Honey, and R. Spielvogel, Achieving local relevance and broader influence, Evaluating Educational Technology: Effective Research Designs for Improving Learning, pp.75-94, 2003.

G. D. Haertel and B. Means, Evaluating Educational Technology: Effective Research Designs for Improving Learning, 2003.

B. Means and G. D. Haertel, Using Technology Evaluation to Enhance Student Learning, 2004.

R. J. Mislevy, L. S. Steinberg, R. G. Almond, G. D. Haertel, and W. R. Penuel, Improving educational assessment, Evaluating Educational Technology: Effective Research Designs for Improving Learning, pp.149-180, 2003.

R. Alexander, C. Ishikawa, S. Silverstein, and M. , A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction, 1977.

D. Ball and D. K. Cohen, Reform by the book: What is?or might be?the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researcher, pp.6-8, 1996.

E. Baumgartner, Synergy research and knowledge integration: Customizing activities around stream ecology Internet environments for science education, 2003.

E. Baumgartner and S. Hsi, CILT2000: Synergy, technology, and teacher professional development, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol.11, issue.3, pp.311-315, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1016041123324

E. Baumgartner, S. Seethaler, B. Cheng, E. Lo, and J. Slotta, Online and midstream: The design of flexibly adaptive tools for understanding water quality, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2000.

A. L. Brown and J. C. Campione, Psychological theory and the design of learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems, Innovations in learning: New environments for education, pp.289-325, 1996.

D. C. Edelson, D. N. Gordin, and R. D. Pea, Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and Curriculum Design, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.8, issue.3-4, pp.391-450, 1999.
DOI : 10.1080/10508406.1999.9672075
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190609

E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides, Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented software, 1995.

J. H. Gray, CILT2000: Community tools, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol.11, issue.3, pp.297-299, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1016084905577

S. Hsi, J. Collison, and C. Staudt, Bridging Web-based science learning with outdoor inquiry using Palm computers, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2000.

Y. Kali, CILT2000: Visualization and modeling, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol.11, issue.3, pp.305-310, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1016089006485

J. Krajcik, P. Blumenfeld, R. Marx, and E. Soloway, Instructional, curricular, and technological supports for inquiry in science classrooms Inquiry into inquiry: Science learning and teaching, 1999.

E. C. Lagemann, Usable knowledge in education: A memorandum for the Spencer Foundation Board of Directors, 2002.

M. C. Linn and S. Hsi, Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners, 2000.

M. C. Linn, L. Shear, P. Bell, and J. D. Slotta, Organizing principles for science education partnerships: Case studies of students' learning about ???rats in space??? and ???deformed frogs???, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol.14, issue.5, pp.47-61, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02299466

B. D. Mccandliss, M. Kalchman, and P. Bryant, Design Experiments and Laboratory Approaches to Learning: Steps Toward Collaborative Exchange, Educational Researcher, vol.32, issue.1, pp.14-16, 2003.
DOI : 10.3102/0013189X032001014

R. D. Pea, R. F. Tinker, M. C. Linn, B. Means, J. D. Bransford et al., Toward a Learning Technologies knowledge network, Educational Technology Research and Development, pp.47-66, 1999.
DOI : 10.1007/BF02299463
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190608

R. D. Pea, New media communication forums for improving education research and practice, Issues in Education Research: Problems and Possibilities, pp.336-370, 1999.

J. Ravitz, CILT2000: Using technology to support ongoing formative assessment in the classroom, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol.11, issue.3, pp.293-296, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1016032821506

B. J. Reiser, J. P. Spillane, F. Steinmuller, D. Sorsa, K. Carney et al., Investigating the mutual adaptation process in teachers' design of technology-infused curricula, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Sciences, 2000.

B. J. Reiser, I. Tabak, W. A. Sandoval, B. K. Smith, F. Steinmuller et al., Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress, pp.263-305, 2001.

J. Roschelle, C. Digiano, M. Moutlis, A. Repenning, J. Philips et al., Lessons from research with educational software components, IEEE Computer, issue.32, p.50, 1999.

D. L. Schwartz, X. Lin, S. Brophy, and J. D. Bransford, Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs Instructional design theories and models, Volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory, 1999.

N. B. Songer, Exploring Learning Opportunities in Coordinated Network-Enhanced Classrooms: A Case of Kids as Global Scientists, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.13, issue.10, pp.297-327, 1996.
DOI : 10.1207/s15327809jls0504_1

D. E. Stokes, Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation, 1997.

R. Tinker and P. Vahey, CILT2000: Ubiquitous computing, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol.11, issue.3, pp.301-304, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1016037022415

N. Vye, D. L. Schwartz, J. D. Bransford, B. J. Barron, L. Zech et al., SMART environments that support monitoring, reflection, and revision, Metacognition in educational theory and practice, pp.305-346, 1998.

R. Barab, S. A. Squire, and K. D. , Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground, The Journal of the Learning Sciences
DOI : 10.1207/S15327809JLS10-1-2_6

P. Bell, C. M. Hoadley, and M. C. Linn, (in press) Design-based research in education Internet environments for science education

A. L. Brown, Design Experiments: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Creating Complex Interventions in Classroom Settings, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.22, issue.1, pp.141-178, 1992.
DOI : 10.1016/0010-0285(88)90014-X

A. Collins, Toward a Design Science of Education, New directions in educational technology, pp.15-22, 1992.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-77750-9_2

M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, and P. Bell, (in press) Internet environments for science education

M. C. Linn and S. Hsi, Computers, teachers, peers: Science learning partners, 2000.

Y. Kali, CILT2000: Visualization and modeling, Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol.11, issue.3, pp.305-310, 2002.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1016089006485

Y. Kali, M. Spitulnik, and M. Linn, The CILT Design Principles Database: A new form of synthesis for technology-based curriculum design, Interactive poster session at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 2003.

Y. Kali, M. Spitulnik, and M. Linn, How design knowledge is synthesized

R. Baker and E. , Understanding educational quality: Where validity meets Technology, 1998.

H. William, B. Angoff-memorial-lecture-series-bannan-ritland, N. Dabbagh, and K. Murphy, Learning object systems as constructivist learning environments: Related assumptions, theories, and applications The instructional use of learning objects: Online version Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school, Phi Delta Kappan, 1998.

N. Bos, Adapting an offline learning game for online play, ETR&D, 2004.

J. Bransford, Toward the development of a stronger community of educators: New opportunities made possible by integrating the learning sciences and technology. PT3 Vision Quest on Assessment in e-Learning cultures Early web site by Eric Baumgartner, 2001.

K. Chitwood, C. May, D. Bunnow, and T. Langan, Battle stories from the field: Wisconsin Online Resource Center Learning Objects Project The instructional use of learning objects: Online version, 2000.

G. Collison, B. Elbaum, S. Haavind, and B. Tinker, Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators, 2000.

P. Foltz, D. Laham, and T. Landauer, The Intelligent Essay Assessor: Applications to educational technology, Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, vol.1, issue.22, 1999.

G. Haertel and B. Means, Stronger designs for research on educational uses of technology: Conclusion and implications, 2000.

M. Lamon, R. Reeve, and M. Scardamalia, Mapping learning and the growth of knowledge in a knowledge building community, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2001.

C. H. Orrill, Learning objects to support inquiry-based online learning The instructional use of learning objects: Online version, 2000.

M. M. Recker, A. Walker, and D. A. Wiley, Collaboratively filtering learning objects, 2000.

. Wiley, The instructional use of learning objects: Online version, 2003.

K. Rose and L. Gomez, Using assessment conversations to promote student learning: A comparative analysis of effects on the amount, control, and quality of feedback during student presentations, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2003.

M. Ruiz-primo, S. Schultz, M. Li, and R. Shavelson, On the cognitive validity of interpretations of scores from alternative concept mapping techniques, 1999.

/. Cresst-/-reports, /. T. Shepard, and L. R. , School reform: What we've learned using assessment to improve learning Available at http://www.ascd.org Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?, Educational Leadership American Psychologist, vol.5295, issue.591, pp.14-19, 1995.

J. Underdahl, J. Palacio-cayetano, R. Stevens, C. West, J. Farmer et al., Practice makes perfect: Assessing and enhancing knowledge and problem-solving skills with IMMEX software. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education Available at http://www.immex.ucla Instructional design implications from cognitive science, 1991.

D. A. Wiley, F. Hartline, M. Fabert, M. Robson, and R. Knapp, Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy The instructional use of learning objects: Online version Electronic classroom system enabling interactive self-paced learning, 1989.

R. E. Bennett, Reinventing assessment: Speculations on the future of large-scale educational testing. Princeton, NJ: Policy Information Center, Educational Testing Service Available at http://www.ets.org/research Assessment and Classroom Learning, Assessment in Education, vol.5, issue.1, pp.7-74, 1998.

J. D. Bransford and D. L. Schwartz, Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications, Review of Research in Education, vol.24, pp.61-100, 1999.

J. T. Bruer, Schools for Thought: A Science of Learning in the Classroom, 1993.

R. A. Duschl and D. H. Gitomer, Strategies and Challenges to Changing the Focus of Assessment and Instruction in Science Classrooms, Educational Assessment, vol.17, issue.1, pp.37-73, 1997.
DOI : 10.1207/s15326977ea0401_2

S. Goldman, R. A. Duschl, E. Hunt, and J. Minstrell, Formative and Summative Assessments of Inquiry Science Deliverable #2: Report on the Implementation of the SEPIA Vessels Unit Available at http://www.cilt.org/seedgrants A cognitive approach to the teaching of physics, Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice, pp.51-74, 1994.

M. Cambridge, K. Koedinger, M. M. Seeley, T. Secules, A. J. Petrosino et al., Aligning TIMSS with NCTM Standards: A CILT Assessment Project Available at http://www.cilt.org/seedgrants Schools for thought: Overview of the project and lessons learned from one of the sites, 1996.

T. K. Landauer, P. W. Foltz, and D. Laham, An introduction to latent semantic analysis, Discourse Processes, pp.259-284, 1998.
DOI : 10.1080/01638539809545030

W. R. Penuel, J. Roschelle, V. Crawford, N. Shechtman, and A. L. Abrahamson, Workshop report: Advancing research on the transformative potential of interactive pedagogies and classroom networks, 2004.

R. J. Roselli and S. P. Brophy, Exploring an electronic polling system for the assessment of student progress in two biomedical engineering courses, Proc. ASEE Annu. ConfCD-ROM), Session 2609, p.pp, 2002.

M. Scardamalia, Knowledge Forum (Advances beyond CSILE), Journal of Distance Education Learning Technology Innovation in Canada, vol.17, pp.23-28, 2003.

R. H. Stevens, Search path mapping, Academic Medicine, vol.66, issue.9, pp.72-75, 1991.
DOI : 10.1097/00001888-199109000-00046

L. K. Zech, C. L. Gause-vegam, M. H. Bray, T. Secules, and S. R. Goldman, Content-Based Collaborative Inquiry: A Professional Development Model for Sustaining Educational Reform, Educational Psychologist, vol.15, issue.3, pp.207-217, 2000.
DOI : 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_6

E. H. Html-shortliffe, V. L. Patel, J. Cimino, O. G. Barnett, and R. A. Greenes, A study of collaboration among medical informatics research laboratories, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol.12, issue.2, pp.97-103, 1993.
DOI : 10.1016/S0933-3657(97)00045-6

E. Wegner, Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity, 1999.

B. Fishman, Linking the learning sciences to systemic reform: Teacher learning, leadership & technology, Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2002.

G. Moore, Crossing the Chasm, HarperBusiness, 1991.

L. A. Shepard, The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture, Educational Researcher, vol.29, issue.7, pp.4-14, 2000.
DOI : 10.3102/0013189X029007004

E. Soloway, Keynote Presentation at Moving Beyond Access in K?12 Educationhtml National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center The Engineering Research Centers (ERC) Program: An assessment of Benefits and Outcomes Available at http://www.nsf.gov/pubs, Online Inquiry: From Classroom Curriculum to District Adoption and Everything In Between-eportney U.S. Department of Commerce Making Partnerships Work. U.S. Department of Commerce. See www.technology.gov, 1997.

W. Stroup and A. Petrosino, An analysis of horizontal and vertical device design for school-related teaching and learning, Education, Communication & Information, vol.3, issue.3, pp.327-345, 2003.
DOI : 10.1080/1463631032000149665