R. J. Beichner, The effect of simultaneous motion presentation and graph generation in a kinematics lab, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol.18, issue.8, pp.803-815, 1990.
DOI : 10.1002/tea.3660270809

C. F. Berger, C. R. Lu, S. J. Belzer, and B. E. Voss, Research on the uses of technology in science education, Handbook of research on science teaching and learning, pp.466-490, 1994.

J. Bernhard, Physics Learning and Microcomputer Based Laboratory (MBL) Learning Effects of Using MBL as a Technological and as a Cognitive Tool, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-94-017-0165-5_34

V. Kariotoglou, G. Tselfes, and E. Fassoulopoulos, Dodrecht, Science education research in the knowledge based society, pp.313-321

H. Brasell, The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol.77, issue.4, pp.385-295, 1987.
DOI : 10.1002/tea.3660240409

J. S. Brown, A. Collins, and P. Duguid, Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning, Educational Researcher, vol.18, issue.1, pp.32-42, 1989.
DOI : 10.3102/0013189X018001032

S. S. Choi-koh, Effect of a Graphing Calculator on a 10th-Grade Student's Study of Trigonometry, The Journal of Educational Research, vol.82, issue.6, pp.359-369, 2003.
DOI : 10.2307/749255

P. Cobb, Reasoning With Tools and Inscriptions, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.11, issue.2-3, pp.187-215, 2002.
DOI : 10.1080/10508406.2002.9672137
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.597.4722

M. Euler and A. Müller, Physics learning and the computer: a review, with a taste of meta-analysis, Paper presented at the Second International Conference of the European Science Education Research Association. What makes, p.35, 1999.

H. Garfinkel, Studies in ethnomethodology, 1967.

C. Goodwin, The Blackness of Black: Color Categories as Situated Practice, 1997.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-662-03362-3_6

J. G. Greeno, On Claims That Answer the Wrong Questions, Educational Researcher, vol.26, issue.1, pp.5-17, 1997.
DOI : 10.3102/0013189X026001005

J. G. Greeno and S. V. Goldman, Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning, 1998.

C. Heath and P. Luff, Technology in action, 2000.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511489839

J. Heritage, Garfinkel and ethnomethodology, 1984.

S. Hester and D. Francis, Local educational order: ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action, 2000.
DOI : 10.1075/pbns.73

I. Hutchby and R. Wooffitt, Conversation analysis, 1998.
DOI : 10.1075/hop.m.con4

B. Jordan and A. Henderson, Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice, Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol.3, issue.409, pp.39-103, 1995.
DOI : 10.1016/0020-7373(91)90039-A

M. Kearney, D. F. Treagust, S. Yeo, and M. G. Zadnik, Student and teacher perceptions of the use of multimedia supported predict-observe-explain tasks to probe understanding, pp.589-615, 2001.

G. J. Kelly and T. Crawford, Student's interaction with computer representations: Analysis of discourse in laboratory groups, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol.33, issue.7, pp.693-707, 1996.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199609)33:7<693::AID-TEA1>3.0.CO;2-I

M. Lampert and M. L. Blunk, Talking mathematics in school: studies of teaching and learning, 1998.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511571251

J. Lave and E. Wenger, Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, 1991.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511815355

M. C. Linn, J. W. Layman, and R. Nachamias, Cognitive consequences of microcomputer-based laboratories: Graphing skills development, Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol.12, issue.3, pp.244-253, 1987.
DOI : 10.1016/S0361-476X(87)80029-2

M. C. Linn and N. B. Songer, Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: what are the appropriate cognitive demands, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, issue.10, pp.28-885, 1991.

L. C. Mcdermott, Research and computer???based instruction: Opportunity for interaction, American Journal of Physics, vol.58, issue.5, pp.452-462, 1990.
DOI : 10.1119/1.16487

J. R. Mokros and R. F. Tinker, The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children's ability to interpret graphs, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol.14, issue.4, pp.369-383, 1987.
DOI : 10.1002/tea.3660240408

M. B. Nakhleh, A review of microcomputer-based labs: how have they affected science learning?, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, vol.13, issue.4, 1994.

R. Nemirovsky, T. Cornelia, and T. Wright, Body Motion and Graphing, Cognition and Instruction, vol.2, issue.1, pp.119-172, 1998.
DOI : 10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1

R. Nemirovsky and T. Noble, Mathematical visualization and the place where we live, Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol.33, issue.2, pp.99-131, 1997.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1002983213048

L. R. Newton and L. Rogers, Teaching science with ICT, p.37, 2001.

E. Ochs, P. Gonzales, and S. Jacoby, ???When I come down I'm in the domain state???: grammar and graphic representation in the interpretive activity of physicists, Grammar and interaction, pp.328-369, 1996.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511620874.007

W. Roth, Discourse and agency in school science laboratories, Discourse Processes, pp.27-60, 1999.
DOI : 10.2307/3035022

W. Roth and M. K. Mcginn, Graphing: a cognitive ability or cultural practice? Science Education, pp.91-106, 1997.

W. Roth and M. K. Mcginn, Inscriptions: Toward a Theory of Representing as Social Practice, Review of Educational Research, vol.68, issue.1, pp.35-60, 1998.
DOI : 10.3102/00346543068001035

W. Roth, C. Woszczyna, and G. Smith, Affordances and constraints of computers in science education, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol.33, issue.9, pp.996-1017, 1996.
DOI : 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199611)33:9<995::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-Q

D. Russell, K. B. Lucas, and C. J. Mcrobbie, The role of microcomputer-based laboratory display in supporting the construction of new understandings in kinematics, Research in Science Education, vol.33, issue.2, pp.217-243, 2003.
DOI : 10.1023/A:1025073410522

R. Säljö and J. Wyndhamn, PROBLEM-SOLVING, ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AND SITUATED REASONING. A STUDY OF JOINT COGNITIVE ACTIVITY IN THE FORMAL SETTING, British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol.60, issue.3, pp.245-254, 1990.
DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1990.tb00942.x

S. Sarangi and C. Roberts, Talk, work and institutional order: discourse in medical, mediation and management settings, 2000.
DOI : 10.1515/9783110208375

D. G. Silverman, The child as a social object: Down's Syndrome children in a paediatric cardiology clinic., Sociology of Health and Illness, vol.13, issue.3, pp.254-274, 1981.
DOI : 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10486744

D. G. Silverman, Discourse of counselling: HIV counselling as social interaction, 1997.

D. G. Silverman, Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction, 2001.

L. A. Suchman, Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication, 1987.

R. K. Thornton and D. R. Sokoloff, Learning motion concepts using real???time microcomputer???based laboratory tools, American Journal of Physics, vol.58, issue.9, pp.858-867, 1990.
DOI : 10.1119/1.16350

R. F. Tinker, Microcomputer-based labs educational research and standards, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-61189-6

R. White and R. Gunstone, Probing understanding, 1992.