S. K. Brem and L. J. Rips, Explanation and Evidence in Informal Argument, Cognitive Science, vol.113, issue.4, pp.573-604, 2000.
DOI : 10.1207/s15516709cog2404_2

P. Dillenbourg, Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design, Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL, pp.61-91, 2002.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190230

I. Kollar, F. Fischer, and F. W. Hesse, Cooperation Scripts for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning -CSCL 2003, COMMUNITY EVENTS -Communication and Interaction, pp.59-61, 2003.

D. Kuhn, V. Shaw, and M. Felton, Effects of Dyadic Interaction on Argumentive Reasoning, Cognition and Instruction, vol.5, issue.3, pp.287-315, 1997.
DOI : 10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.181

S. Leitão, The Potential of Argument in Knowledge Building, Human Development, vol.43, issue.6, pp.332-360, 2000.
DOI : 10.1159/000022695

M. L. Means and J. F. Voss, Who Reasons Well? Two Studies of Informal Reasoning Among Children of Different Grade, Ability, and Knowledge Levels, Cognition and Instruction, vol.208, issue.2, pp.139-178, 1996.
DOI : 10.1016/0959-4752(91)90013-X

K. L. Mcneil, D. J. Lizotte, J. Krajcik, and R. W. Marx, Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations using scaffolded curriculum materials and assessments, 2004.

O. Donnell, A. M. Dansereau, and D. F. , Scripted Cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning, pp.120-141, 1992.

O. Donnell and A. M. , Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation, Cognitive perspectives on peer learning, pp.179-196, 1999.

D. N. Perkins, Person-plus: a distributed view of thinking and learning, Distributed cognitions: psychological and educational considerations, pp.88-110, 1993.

B. J. Reiser, I. Tabak, W. A. Sandoval, B. K. Smith, F. Steinmuller et al., BGuiLE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress, pp.263-305, 2001.

L. B. Resnick, M. Salmon, C. M. Zeitz, S. H. Wathen, and M. Holowchak, Reasoning in conversation, Cognition and Instruction, issue.3&4, pp.11-347, 1993.

R. C. Schank and R. P. Abelson, SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING, 1977.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-1-4832-1446-7.50019-4
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00692030

D. L. Schwartz, X. Lin, S. Brophy, and J. D. Bransford, Towards the development of flexibly adaptive instructional design Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory, pp.183-213, 1999.

J. D. Slotta and M. C. Linn, How do students make sense of Internet resources in the science classroom, Learning the sciences of the 21st Century, 2000.

S. Toulmin, The Uses of Argument, 1958.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511840005

A. Weinberger, M. Reiserer, B. Ertl, F. Fischer, and H. Mandl, Facilitating collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated learning with structuring tools
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00197407