M. Barros and M. Verdejo, Analysing student interaction processes in order to improve collaboration. The DEGREE approach, Int. J. of Art. Int. in Education, vol.11, pp.221-241, 2000.

R. Bentley, W. Appelt, . U. Busbach, E. Hinrichs, D. Kerr et al., Basic support for cooperative work on the World Wide Web, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol.46, issue.6, pp.827-846, 1997.
DOI : 10.1006/ijhc.1996.0108

H. Cho, M. Stefanone, and G. Gay, Social information sharing in a CSCL community, Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Foundations for a CSCL Community, CSCL '02, pp.43-50, 2002.
DOI : 10.3115/1658616.1658623

C. Collazos, L. Guerrero, J. Pino, and S. Ochoa, Evaluating Collaborative Learning Processes, Proc. of the 8th Int. Workshop on Groupware, pp.203-221, 2002.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-46124-8_14

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

T. Daradoumis, M. Guitert, F. Giménez, J. M. Marquès, and T. Lloret, Supporting the composition of effective virtual groups for collaborative learning, International Conference on Computers in Education, 2002. Proceedings., pp.332-336, 2002.
DOI : 10.1109/CIE.2002.1185939

T. Daradoumis, F. Xhafa, and J. M. Marquès, Evaluating Collaborative Learning Practices in a Virtual Groupware Environment, Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, pp.438-443, 2003.

T. Daradoumis, F. Xhafa, and J. M. Marquès, Exploring Interaction Behaviour and Performance of Online Collaborative Learning Teams, Proc. of the 9th Int. Workshop on Groupware, pp.203-221, 2003.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-39850-9_11

P. Dillenbourg, Collaborative Learning. Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp.1-19, 1999.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190699

J. Frechtling and L. Sharp, User-Friendly Handbook for Mixed Evaluations. Directorate for Education and Human Resources Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication, 1997.

J. Macdonald, Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product, Computers & Education, vol.40, issue.4, pp.40-377, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00168-9

URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=

J. E. Mcgrath, Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP): A Theory of Groups, Small Group Research, vol.22, issue.2, pp.147-174, 1991.
DOI : 10.1177/1046496491222001

A. Martínez, Y. Dimitriadis, B. Rubia, E. Gómez, and P. De-la-fuente, Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions, Computers & Education, vol.41, issue.4, pp.353-368, 2003.
DOI : 10.1016/j.compedu.2003.06.001

M. Mühlenbrock, Action-based collaboration analysis for group learning, 2001.

A. Sfard, On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One, Educational Researcher, vol.27, issue.2, pp.4-13, 1998.
DOI : 10.3102/0013189X027002004

A. Soller, Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System, Int. J. of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol.12, pp.40-62, 2001.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00197321

S. Wasserman and K. Faust, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, 1994.
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511815478

N. Webb, Testing a theoretical model of student interaction and learning in small groups Interaction in Cooperative Groups: The Theoretical Anatomy of Group Learning, pp.102-119, 1992.

D. W. Wortham, Nodal and matrix analyses of communication patterns in small groups, Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning, CSCL '99, pp.681-686, 1999.
DOI : 10.3115/1150240.1150322

J. Zumbach, M. Mühlenbrock, M. Jansen, P. Reimann, and H. U. Hoppe, Multidimensional Tracking in Virtual Learning Teams, Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL community. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp.650-651, 2000.